In FHS-2.3, we have /media
that holds mount points for removable media such as CD-ROMs and we have /mnt
that holds temporarily mounted filesystems.
On the other hand, we have /run/media
and /run/mount
. For me, the CDs and USBs are mounted on /run/media.
I don't see any clear distinction between them(/media
, /mnt
, /run/mount
) . What are their differences?
I have seen similar trend (mount on /run/media) in fedora 20 - GNOME 3.10.4 and ubuntu 14.04.1 (installed on virtual box) with GNOME 3.10.4. But when I plugged in a USB flash (with auto-mounter script) on a system with Centos 6 and GNOME 2.28.2 it was mounted on /media
/run/mount/
thing happens when you use some kind of auto-mounter script - it mounts the disk in a user-owned directory./media
and/mnt
are root-owned usually - so there's that at least. – mikeserv Dec 31 '14 at 12:12udisks2
mounts to/run/media
and the olderudisks
mounts to/media
... See also What is this new /run filesystem? – jasonwryan Jan 03 '15 at 00:10