To run crossover i need to install libnss-mdns:i386
, but this depends on base-files:i386
.
When i ran apt-get install base-files:i386
it outputs this:
root@ntrnnr17:/home/username# apt-get install base-files:i386
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
base-files bash bash-completion build-essential dpkg-dev heirloom-mailx libextutils-pkgconfig-perl
libglib-object-introspection-perl libnss-mdns nvidia-settings pkg-config rsync ubuntu-standard
The following NEW packages will be installed:
base-files:i386
WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed.
This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!
base-files bash
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 13 to remove and 229 not upgraded.
Need to get 65,8 kB of archives.
After this operation, 10,2 MB disk space will be freed.
You are about to do something potentially harmful.
To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'
?] _
This is not the normal confirmation prompt i get, i have CTRL^C'd out of this.
I really want to use crossover, but not if installing a dependency kills my OS.
Is it safe?
Should i make backups of certain files prior to install?
apt-get
tells you exactly what the impact of forcing the installation would be; in the list of packages to be removed, the only two that worry me arebash
andubuntu-standard
. The former can easily be fixed by installingbash:i386
, I don't know about the latter. In any case you should be able to revert such an installation by removinglibnss-mdns:i386
and re-installingbash:amd64
andbase-files:amd64
. But you're wondering into unsupported territory here... – Stephen Kitt Feb 03 '16 at 09:30schroot -c jessie32 crossover
instead ofcrossover
. – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Feb 03 '16 at 12:42base-files
isMulti-Arch: foreign
which allows it to satisfy dependencies for any architecture. In Ubuntu that corresponds to 14.10; what version are you using? – Stephen Kitt Feb 03 '16 at 13:06apt-get install libnss-mdns:i386
instead of installingbase-files:i386
? – Stephen Kitt Feb 04 '16 at 13:58