10
func() {
    echo 'hello'
    echo 'This is an error' >&2
}

a=$(func)
b=???

I'd like to redirect the stderr to b variable without creating a temporary file.

 echo $b
 # output should be: "This is an error"

The solution that works but with a temporary file:

touch temp.txt
exec 3< temp.txt
a=$(func 2> temp.txt);
cat <&3
rm temp.txt

So the question is, how do I redirect the stderr of the function func to the variable b without the need of a temporary file?

Jeff Schaller
  • 67,283
  • 35
  • 116
  • 255
smarber
  • 1,191
  • 2
  • 12
  • 25
  • Related SO question that may be useful: https://stackoverflow.com/q/962255/1640661 – Anthony Geoghegan Mar 14 '18 at 12:40
  • @AnthonyGeoghegan I'd like to store both stderr and stdout in two variables, not only the stderr – smarber Mar 14 '18 at 12:54
  • 1
    From their comments, it seems the SO questioner also wanted to preserve the stdout (pass it on a pipe). I don't think they got a completely satisfactory answer but I thought the link still might be of interest to you. – Anthony Geoghegan Mar 14 '18 at 13:01

3 Answers3

11

On Linux and with shells that implement here-documents with writable temporary files (like zsh or bash versions prior to 5.1 do), you can do:

{
  out=$(
    chmod u+w /dev/fd/3 && # needed for bash5.0
      ls /dev/null /x 2> /dev/fd/3
  )
  status=$?
  err=$(cat<&3)
} 3<<EOF
EOF

printf '%s=<%s>\n' out "$out" err "$err" status "$status"

(where ls /dev/null /x is an example command that outputs something on both stdout and stderr).

With zsh, you can also do:

(){ out=$(ls /dev/null /x 2> $1) status=$? err=$(<$1);} =(:)

(where =(cmd) is a form of process substitution that uses temporary files, and (){ code; } args anonymous functions).

In any case, you'd want to use temporary files. Any solution that would use pipes would be prone to deadlocks in case of large outputs. You could read stdout and stderr through two separate pipes and use select()/poll() and some reads in a loop to read data as it comes from the two pipes without causing lock-ups, but that would be quite involved and AFAIK, only zsh has select() support built-in and only yash a raw interface to pipe() (more on that at Read / write to the same file descriptor with shell redirection).

Another approach could be to store one of the streams in temporary memory instead of a temporary file. Like (zsh or bash syntax):

{
  IFS= read -rd '' err
  IFS= read -rd '' out
  IFS= read -rd '' status
} < <({ out=$(ls /dev/null /x); } 2>&1; printf '\0%s' "$out" "$?")

(assuming the command doesn't output any NUL)

Note that $err will include the trailing newline character.

Other approaches could be to decorate the stdout and stderr differently and remove the decoration upon reading:

out= err= status=
while IFS= read -r line; do
  case $line in
    (out:*)    out=$out${line#out:}$'\n';;
    (err:*)    err=$err${line#err:}$'\n';;
    (status:*) status=${line#status:};;
  esac
done < <(
  {
    {
      ls /dev/null /x |
        grep --label=out --line-buffered -H '^' >&3
      echo >&3 "status:${PIPESTATUS[0]}" # $pipestatus[1] in zsh
    } 2>&1 |
      grep --label=err --line-buffered -H '^'
  } 3>&1

)

That assumes GNU grep and that the lines are short enough. With lines bigger than PIPEBUF (4K on Linux), lines of the output of the two greps could end up being mangled together in chunks.

  • Are here-documents documented anywhere as being writable (or only by reading the bash source code)? 2) Are here-documents kept nowadays in memory instead of using temp files (and is that documented)? 3) The process substitution solutions look hard to modify to capture the exit status. Ideas?
  • – jrw32982 Oct 29 '19 at 21:59
  • probably not, it's a bit of a hack. POSIX leaves it now unspecified (on my request) 2) no, it has to be open on a file descriptor so it can't just be in memory (other than files in tmpfs or the like), in pratice, shells either use a temp file or a pipe, bash uses temp files and always has. 3) not simple, but probably doable.
  • – Stéphane Chazelas Oct 30 '19 at 07:13
  • @jrw32982, see edit for status (untested) – Stéphane Chazelas Oct 30 '19 at 07:35
  • no longer works in bash 5.0, and I think that you were inolved in its demise ;-) –  Oct 30 '19 at 09:14
  • @mosvy thanks, I hadn't realised they had fixed it that way. I've edited in a work around. There are dozen more answers I'll have to edit in the same way here (sigh). – Stéphane Chazelas Oct 30 '19 at 10:09
  • Wonderful answer! – javabrett Jan 06 '21 at 10:37