Must the shebang header always match the interpreter's installation directory? If so, then why do both #!/usr/bin/python
and #!/usr/local/bin/python
work for me?

- 22,340

- 169
3 Answers
As others have noted, the shebang line must refer to an actual file that exists.
Since different systems can have binaries installed to different locations, this is a weakness of script portability.
One way to solve this is with links, as others have mentioned.
Another way is to edit the script to refer to the right path on your system.
One more way to get around this is to use /usr/bin/env
, which will find the executable in your PATH.
So instead of:
#!/usr/bin/python
Write:
#!/usr/bin/env python
This way, people just have to symlink /usr/bin/env
if needed, rather than every individual executable.
Of course, the executable still has to be in your PATH for this to work...
As you can see, there is no 100% clean solution. Remember: "Worse is Better" (:

- 1,467
The #!
(shebang) line must specify an executable that actually exists. If both work on your system, it means you have a python installed in both places. Or, possibly, a symlink.
Normally, you'd get an error attempted to use an interpreter that doesn't exist:
anthony@Zia:~$ /tmp/test
bash: /tmp/test: /usr/local/bin/python: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
If you instead run the script like this, then the path likely doesn't matter:
anthony@Zia:~$ python /tmp/test
anthony@Zia:~$
That's because you're running python directly, and passing it an argument. Python then decides to open that file and treat it as a script. In the first case, the kernel is attempting to run the script as an executable. It checks it, notices shebang line, and attempts to convert it to the second form, so it can actually run it. That fails if the path given after #!
doesn't actually exist.

- 109,670
Shebang is a combination of the following characters: #!
when it appears in the first line of the script. The following string is always the path to the interpreter. I'd check what exactly /usr/bin/python
and /usr/local/bin/python
are. It's possible that one of them is a symlink into the other. Could you please, provide the output of the following commands:
ls -l /usr/bin/python
ls -l /usr/local/bin/python

- 73,126

- 31
-
avimehenwal@AviMehenwal-DYNAC:~/Documents/PYTHON$ python p1.py Hello World avimehenwal@AviMehenwal-DYNAC:~/Documents/PYTHON$ python p2.py Hello World avimehenwal@AviMehenwal-DYNAC:~/Documents/PYTHON$ ls -l /usr/bin/python lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Feb 24 23:27 /usr/bin/python -> python2.7 avimehenwal@AviMehenwal-DYNAC:~/Documents/PYTHON$ ls -l /usr/local/bin/python ls: cannot access /usr/local/bin/python: No such file or directory – avimehenwal Feb 27 '13 at 21:32
/usr/bin/
than in/usr/local/bin/
. As Guardian said in case of your distribution it may be symlink. In my Gentoo second option will fail, as there is no python and no symlink. Also you could check my answer about recommended shebang for python... – pbm Feb 27 '13 at 21:30/usr/bin/python
and/usr/local/bin/python
are valid interpreters on your system. They may or may not be the same. – Keith Thompson Feb 28 '13 at 01:56