I restored an EBS volume and attached it to a new EC2 instance. When I lsblk
I can see it under the name /dev/nvme1n1
.
More specifically the output of lsblk
is:
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
loop0 7:0 0 25M 1 loop /snap/amazon-ssm-agent/4046
loop1 7:1 0 55.4M 1 loop /snap/core18/2128
loop2 7:2 0 61.9M 1 loop /snap/core20/1169
loop3 7:3 0 67.3M 1 loop /snap/lxd/21545
loop4 7:4 0 32.5M 1 loop /snap/snapd/13640
loop5 7:5 0 55.5M 1 loop /snap/core18/2246
loop6 7:6 0 67.2M 1 loop /snap/lxd/21835
nvme0n1 259:0 0 8G 0 disk
└─nvme0n1p1 259:1 0 8G 0 part /
nvme1n1 259:2 0 100G 0 disk
As you can see nvme1n1
has no partitions. As a result, when I try to mount it on a folder with:
sudo mkdir mount_point
sudo mount /dev/nvme1n1 mount_point/
I get
mount: /home/ubuntu/mount_point: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/nvme1n1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
The volume has data inside:
/dev/nvme1n1: data
Using sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/nvme1n1
to create a filesystem is not an option as Amazon states that:
Warning Do not use this command if you're mounting a volume that already has data on it (for example, a volume that was created from a snapshot). Otherwise, you'll format the volume and delete the existing data.
Indeed I tried it with a second dummy ebs snapshot that I recovered and all I got is a dummy lost+found
linux folder.
This EBS recovered snapshot has useful data inside, how can I mount it without destroying them?
# parted -l /dev/nvme1n1 print
Model: Amazon Elastic Block Store (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 8590MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 8590MB 8589MB primary ext4 boot
Error: /dev/nvme1n1: unrecognised disk label
Model: Amazon Elastic Block Store (nvme)
Disk /dev/nvme1n1: 107GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:
dmesg | grep nvme1n1
[ 68.475368] EXT4-fs (nvme1n1): VFS: Can't find ext4 filesystem
[ 96.604971] EXT4-fs (nvme1n1): VFS: Can't find ext4 filesystem
[ 254.674651] EXT4-fs (nvme1n1): VFS: Can't find ext4 filesystem
[ 256.438712] EXT4-fs (nvme1n1): VFS: Can't find ext4 filesystem
sudo fsck /dev/nvme1n1
fsck from util-linux 2.34
e2fsck 1.45.5 (07-Jan-2020)
ext2fs_open2: Bad magic number in super-block
fsck.ext2: Superblock invalid, trying backup blocks...
fsck.ext2: Bad magic number in super-block while trying to open /dev/nvme1n1
The superblock could not be read or does not describe a valid ext2/ext3/ext4
filesystem. If the device is valid and it really contains an ext2/ext3/ext4
filesystem (and not swap or ufs or something else), then the superblock
is corrupt, and you might try running e2fsck with an alternate superblock:
e2fsck -b 8193 <device>
or
e2fsck -b 32768 <device>
mount -r -t ext4 /dev/nvme1n1 /some/mountpoint
which will mount the diskread-only
and in this case (since dmesg is showing ext4) it most probably is an ext4 file system. – Valentin Bajrami Nov 08 '21 at 13:25sudo mount /dev/nvme1n1p1 ctf/ -t ext4
results tomount: /home/ubuntu/ctf: special device /dev/nvme1n1p1 does not exist.
– HelloWorld Nov 08 '21 at 13:43nvme1n1p1
. Herep1
would refer to the first partition on the block device which you don't have as I mentioned in my previous comments which I deleted. You need to mount the whole disk since the partition (it seems ) has been created on the whole disk. – Valentin Bajrami Nov 08 '21 at 13:45sudo mount /dev/nvme1n1 mount_point/ -t ext4
and it failed with the same message. Do I get something wrong? – HelloWorld Nov 08 '21 at 13:53-r
flag? What does the dmesg show you then? – Valentin Bajrami Nov 08 '21 at 14:50[11877.345591] EXT4-fs (nvme1n1): VFS: Can't find ext4 filesystem
– HelloWorld Nov 08 '21 at 16:05ext4
though? If you look aboveError: /dev/nvme1n1: unrecognised disk label
./dev/nvme0n1
which is the root is ext4. Is there a case this confused you? – HelloWorld Nov 08 '21 at 16:06dmesg
is explicitly mentioningEXT4-fs (nvme1n1): VFS: Can't find ext4 filesystem
. Thenvme0n1
has indeed theboot
partition on ext4 but we don't have to deal with that. I see there are some related posts like yours here: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/315063/mount-wrong-fs-type-bad-option-bad-superblock Please have a look there but don't runmkfs
or anything like this because this might cause data loss. Runningfsck
can help and won't harm. – Valentin Bajrami Nov 08 '21 at 21:09fsck
to the question. – HelloWorld Nov 09 '21 at 07:54/dev/nvme1n1: data
"... no, that just meansfile
couldn't identify what the contents are. It could be garbage for all we know. It might be an encrypted volume. Nothing so far shows you have a valid filesystem there. – muru Nov 09 '21 at 08:03