I have these 2 commands being executed one after the other.
cat a.log >> b.log
rm -r a.log
What is exactly happening here? Why is cat being used here? What about the >> sign ? And what is the -r(recursive) flag being used?
I have these 2 commands being executed one after the other.
cat a.log >> b.log
rm -r a.log
What is exactly happening here? Why is cat being used here? What about the >> sign ? And what is the -r(recursive) flag being used?
Considering your corrected code,
cat a.log >> b.log rm -r a.log
The cat
copies its list of files, or stdin if either none is supplied or a dash (-
) is included in the list to its stdout. See man cat
The >>
is a standard shell redirection operator that appends a command's output to a named file. In the example this named file is b.log
. See man bash
or the documentation for your preferred shell if not bash
, and What are the shell's control and redirection operators?
The rm
command (almost) unconditionally removes the file a.log
. Because it's trying to remove a file, the -r
flag is irrelevant and is ignored. If being run in an interactive session the command will ask the user for confirmation if the file does not have write permission. See man rm
If I were writing this code I would probably construct it like this
cat a.log >> b.log && rm -f a.log
Here, the removal of the a.log
file happens only if the cat
successfully appended its contents to the target file b.log
.
a.log
rather thanb.log
, i.e.rm -f a.log
. But not an answer because it's only conjecture – Chris Davies Jan 06 '22 at 09:20cat
a directory (only the files within it), andrm -r
only has meaning for directories. So one (or both) of those commands was written by somebody who did not know what they were doing. Also, there is no error checking. It would be nice to be sure the cat worked (e.g. b.log could be created if needed, and permissions to write, and disk not full) before discarding a.log. – Paul_Pedant Jan 06 '22 at 10:31