Lightweight custom linux build

Question

I am looking for a Linux build that takes up very little memory to boot up. I don't need any of the UI modules.

I need to choose from the ones currently available or pointers on building my own. I looked at some Linux distros like Arch Linux and Damn Small Linux, but I haven't decided yet. And also it would be great to run a custom program immediately on bootup.

This would probably have been better on http://unix.stackexchange.com/ or http://superuser.com/ as it isn't really a programming problem at all. The answer to the second half of your question (running a program at boot) is "Look into the init process." (possibly a script under /etc/init.d is all it takes, but that depends on your timing requirements). — dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten, Feb 12 '11 at 17:45
See Which minimal but extendable Linux distribution to choose, Distro- lightweight and easy to install, and other questions under /distribution-choice. You may get more specific recommendations if you say what you're going to use the system for (networking? home/industrial automation? monitoring? …). — Gilles 'SO- stop being evil', Feb 12 '11 at 22:13

score 3 · Accepted Answer · answered Feb 13 '11 at 11:51

3

Try TinyCore (or MicroCore even).

TinyCore is at 10MB (ISO) and MicroCore at 6MB. TinyCore has X and a minimal GUI, while MicroCore is text mode only. I use it on a 12 year old laptop with 199MHz and 32MB RAM. Works perfect, even with WLAN, etc.

TinyCore is made with customization abilities in mind. You can easily fork your own minimal dristro from TinyCore. To facilitate this, there's even a remastering how-to in the Wiki.

answered Feb 13 '11 at 11:51

polemon

11,431

Oh this I have not heard of. Will check it out. Thanks! – ryan Feb 14 '11 at 14:22

MarkR · Answer 2 · 2011-02-14T16:09:09.020

2

It is generally possible to roll a system with Busybox; busybox's web site details how to do this.

A statically linked busybox binary will require just a couple of megs of memory (over what the kernel requires, of course). I've been able to boot and log into a machine with 8M of ram.

However, it is relatively complicated to get all the system services you may require working, using a small existing distribution might be better.

How much is "little memory"? Are you on a really tiny embedded system? Unless you have less than 64M, or your process needs to use a lot of the available ram (and no swap), I'd recommend going with a minimal standard distro.

Edit: The "buildroot" tool is a companion of Busybox which helps you to build very small usable filesystems.

edited Feb 14 '11 at 16:09

answered Feb 12 '11 at 21:45

MarkR

171

Little memory is as low as possible. I'm not looking at any bound. Thanks for the info! – ryan Feb 14 '11 at 14:21
Last time I checked, it was not generally possible to buy a machine (including SoC etc) with less than 32 Mb of memory. – MarkR Feb 14 '11 at 16:09

score 2 · Answer 3 · answered Feb 13 '11 at 00:33

You could go with Arch linux, but that doesn't strictly meet your "custom" distro, I think.

I'd go with Linux From Scratch. That's not really a distro, but rather a system for building your own distro. I think you'll find you have some "fat" in your system when you're done, as it has you building and installing Tcl/Tk (or at least it used to) and a few other things that aren't strictly necessary, but let you run test cases semi-automatically.

Yep, I've heard of LFS. But it definitely is more work than using arch. I will give it a shot. thanks! — ryan, Feb 14 '11 at 14:22

score 1 · Answer 4 · answered Apr 15 '12 at 09:53

1

I recommend trying out http://buildroot.net/, and us it to build a custom linux system that suits your needs exactly, you can build tiny system with this.

answered Apr 15 '12 at 09:53

yakamok

500
1
5
11

Lightweight custom linux build

4 Answers4